This tool helps you apply The Coordination Capital Doctrine in a governance-consistent way: evidence for structural drivers, classification of coordination activities, and explicit human judgment — not software authority.
Governance boundary: AI-assisted systems may aggregate evidence and suggest classifications; your board and designated officers retain authority over structural floors, routing, and risk. Use this worksheet with your CCR measurement and CCR calculator results.
Related workbook tools: Readiness assessment · Role mapping · Executive brief · Executive diagnostic
0. Context (for this worksheet)
Optional identifiers help you file exports alongside other governance materials. Nothing here is validated or transmitted.
1. Structural evidence inventory
Check categories where you have defensible inventory (policy, systems, or validated records). Absence flags a governance gap — not a failure to "comply" with this page.
2. Coordination classification review (five buckets)
Indicate which buckets your organization has explicitly reviewed for major coordination forums in the current reporting period. Overrides and edge cases belong in your governance minutes, not in this form.
3. Coordination channels under review
Where are you applying classification and load discipline this period? Check all that apply.
4. Override and audit discipline
Aligns with governance-preserving AI architecture: humans retain classification authority; systems support traceability.
5. Governance notes (human judgment)
Record decisions, open questions, escalation triggers, and references to board or committee minutes.
Exports run in your browser. JSON for systems alignment; Markdown for board appendices and copyedit.